Objective: SURROGATE motherhood represents one of the most controversial forms of commercialization in reproduction Since it was first applied twenty-three years ago in Great Britain, it has been a subject of numerous ethical, medical and legal discussions, and its outcomes have often had epilogues in long-lasting court proceedings.Materials and Methods: Consideration of SURROGATE motherhood in light of numerous ethical dilemmas that this form of reproduction brings.Results: In the case of commercial SURROGATE motherhood there are analysts who are in favor, and those who are explicitly against this method of producing offspring. Thus the advocates of SURROGATE motherhood believe it is acceptable in case it does not cause harm to any other being, and also that every female person has the right to have children, even through SURROGATE motherhood, if that will make her happy, and therefore SURROGATE motherhood should be allowed in the whole world. Opposed to this are the viewpoints that SURROGATE motherhood is not ethical, as it represents parenthood for profit, exploits women of weaker material status, reduces women’s honor. From the ethical point of view, there are additional imposing questions, such as: what should be done if a SURROGATE mother decides to keep the child? What if she wants to visit the child? Is giving a baby over after delivery actually a classical sale? Is renting of SURROGATE mothers moral and under which conditions, and what kind of women could be SURROGATE mothers? If we assume that SURROGATE motherhood is actually legally permitted, a question is raised whether that would result in certain women simply deciding to, out of pure convenience, produce all their children in a way that their child is carried by another person. Considering that in most cases it is the women of lower economic class who apply to be SURROGATE mothers, such contracts could perhaps lead to another division between the rich and the poor. A separate issue is the morality of a SURROGATE mother and her approach to pregnancy in relation to her previous way of life. On the other hand, the necessary ethical approach of contractors – customers of a SURROGATE mother is not negligible in cases when she gives birth to a disabled or malformed child, or becomes ill during pregnancy, and suffers death in pregnancy or at labour.Conclusion: A desire for motherhood is one of fundamental aspirations that accompany the mankind through centuries. One of the ways to realize it in the last decades has also been the commercial SURROGATE motherhood. Still, it is prohibited in a large number of countries as an unethical method of trade in human life, together with the opinion that it represents exploitation of women and their organs. However, the justification of such a solution needs to be considered in couples that due to objective reasons have SURROGATE motherhood as the only option. Considering a series of not only ethical, but also medical, legal and social controversies that accompany commercial SURROGATE motherhood, it should be strictly limited by a reaction of the criminal law. That would prevent manipulations, and a possibility for such contracts to result in long-lasting court proceedings that will impair the quality of life of not only the contractors and the SURROGATE mother, but also of the child born this way.